I have been looking into the relation between evolutionary leaps and geomagnetic refersal.
This subject was brought to my attention after reading Robert Felix book with the same title.
I recently ran into Vukcevic who has been correlating Earth and solar magnetic field variation with regional cimatic variations. This is interesting because IPCC models have a hard time coming up with local forecasts.
The IPCC models have a lot of parameteres and seem to focus on proofing anthropogenic influences on climate change. The climate debat consists of worthy adversaries. The skeptics (skeptical of the IPCC findings) like Roger 'Tallbloke' Tattersall and Joanne Nova are proponents of Scafetta's ideas about solar forcing and astronomical cycles.
While Willis totaly disagrees and claims this kind of science is just as rubbish as Biorythms. Because Scafetta is just looking for plausible cycles to hindcast the actual data. This is a case of correlation and not (yet) causation. This is when vukcevic comes to rescue scafetta with his own theorum.
It would be nice to follow this debate, becasue now we have Geomagnetic field variation finally making its appearance in the discussion on climate change. I wonder when Robert Felix is going to join in?
This subject was brought to my attention after reading Robert Felix book with the same title.
I recently ran into Vukcevic who has been correlating Earth and solar magnetic field variation with regional cimatic variations. This is interesting because IPCC models have a hard time coming up with local forecasts.
The IPCC models have a lot of parameteres and seem to focus on proofing anthropogenic influences on climate change. The climate debat consists of worthy adversaries. The skeptics (skeptical of the IPCC findings) like Roger 'Tallbloke' Tattersall and Joanne Nova are proponents of Scafetta's ideas about solar forcing and astronomical cycles.
While Willis totaly disagrees and claims this kind of science is just as rubbish as Biorythms. Because Scafetta is just looking for plausible cycles to hindcast the actual data. This is a case of correlation and not (yet) causation. This is when vukcevic comes to rescue scafetta with his own theorum.
It would be nice to follow this debate, becasue now we have Geomagnetic field variation finally making its appearance in the discussion on climate change. I wonder when Robert Felix is going to join in?
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten